Comments for Matthew Nied http://matthewnied.com Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:32:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Crookes v. Newton: Hyperlinking, Defamation Law, and Freedom of Expression on the Internet by Tweets – Tuesday 25 October 2011 « CDU Law and Business Online http://matthewnied.com/2011/10/24/crookes-v-newton-hyperlinking-defamation-law-and-freedom-of-expression-on-the-internet/#comment-604 Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:32:12 +0000 http://matthewnied.com/?p=432#comment-604 [...] of key Canadian SC case RT @matthewnied: Crookes v. Newton: Hyperlinking, Defamation Law… bit.ly/svgNdm 25 Oct Favorite Reply Delete Share this:TwitterFacebookLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to [...]

]]> Comment on The Internet, Cloud Computing, and the Charter Right to Privacy: The Effect of Terms of Service Agreements on Reasonable Expectations of Privacy by Law and Media Round Up – 3 October 2011 « Inforrm's Blog http://matthewnied.com/2011/09/30/the-internet-cloud-computing-and-the-charter-right-to-privacy-the-effect-of-terms-of-service-agreements-on-reasonable-expectations-of-privacy/#comment-426 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:55:23 +0000 http://matthewnied.com/?p=364#comment-426 [...] blogger Matthew Nied has published an interesting piece on “The Internet, Cloud Computing and the Charter Right to Privacy: The [...]

]]> Comment on Baglow v. Smith: Removing the Defamatory Sting From Online Debates on Blogs and Message Boards by Case Law: Baglow v. Smith: Removing the Defamatory Sting From Online Debates on Blogs and Message Boards – Matthew Nied « Inforrm's Blog http://matthewnied.com/2011/09/01/baglow-v-smith-removing-the-defamatory-sting-in-internet-debates/#comment-163 Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:31:59 +0000 http://matthewnied.com/?p=323#comment-163 [...] post originally appeared on the Nied Law Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]

]]> Comment on Warman v. Fournier et al: Balancing Disclosure, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression Interests in Internet Defamation Cases by Richard Warman v Free Dominion: the ‘prima facie’ hearing, part 1 « Xanthippa's Chamberpot http://matthewnied.com/2010/05/04/warman-v-wilkins-fournier-balancing-disclosure-privacy-and-freedom-of-expression-interests-in-internet-defamation-cases/#comment-108 Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:17:54 +0000 http://defamationlawblog.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-108 [...] bloggers, perhaps it is best to re-state the conditions, as per the above-mentioned appeal.  From Defamation Law Blog: After surveying previous decisions, Justice Wilton-Siegel set out four considerations, aimed at [...]

]]> Comment on Warman v. Fournier et al: Balancing Disclosure, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression Interests in Internet Defamation Cases by Anonymity in a Canadian Internet Case Defamation Case: Warman v. Fournier « Blog Law Blog http://matthewnied.com/2010/05/04/warman-v-wilkins-fournier-balancing-disclosure-privacy-and-freedom-of-expression-interests-in-internet-defamation-cases/#comment-86 Fri, 21 May 2010 03:00:44 +0000 http://defamationlawblog.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-86 [...] Canadian Defamation Law Blog provides analysis of Warman v. Fournier, 2010 ONSC 2126 (Div. Ct.), regarding ordering disclosure of e-mail addresses and IP addresses of persons making anonymous internet posts in the context of a defamation case. [...]

]]> Comment on Warman v. Fournier et al: Balancing Disclosure, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression Interests in Internet Defamation Cases by Law and Media Roundup, 8 May 2010 « Inforrm's Blog http://matthewnied.com/2010/05/04/warman-v-wilkins-fournier-balancing-disclosure-privacy-and-freedom-of-expression-interests-in-internet-defamation-cases/#comment-82 Sat, 08 May 2010 15:54:47 +0000 http://defamationlawblog.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-82 [...] Canadian Defamation Law Blog has a post about the decision in Warman v Fournier 2010 ONSC 2126 (Div. Ct.) – which [...]

]]> Comment on Swartz v. Does: American and Canadian approaches to anonymity in internet defamation cases by Warman v. Wilkins-Fournier: Balancing Disclosure, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression Interests in Internet Defamation Cases « Defamation Law Blog http://matthewnied.com/2009/10/26/swartz-v-does-american-and-canadian-approaches-to-anonymity-in-internet-defamation-cases/#comment-80 Tue, 04 May 2010 12:07:06 +0000 http://defamationlawblog.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-80 [...] to demonstrate a bona fide or prima facie case of defamation before ordering disclosure (see: previous posting). The motions judge distinguished these cases on the basis that the Respondent was seeking to [...]

]]> Comment on Swartz v. Does: American and Canadian approaches to anonymity in internet defamation cases by Protecting internet anonymity: the case for providing notice to anonymous defendants in defamation cases « Defamation Law Blog http://matthewnied.com/2009/10/26/swartz-v-does-american-and-canadian-approaches-to-anonymity-in-internet-defamation-cases/#comment-28 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:21:50 +0000 http://defamationlawblog.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-28 [...] Several notable American cases have adopted the same or similar notice requirements post-Dendrite: Doe No. 1 v. Cahill, 884 A.2d 451 (Del. 2005); Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe 1, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007); Krinsky v. Doe 6, 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 231 (Ct. App. 2008) (“Krinsky”); Solers, Inc. v. Doe, 977 A.2d 941 (D.C. 2009) and Swartz v. Does (“Swartz“) (Swartz, the most recent of these cases, was discussed in a previous post). [...]

]]>